So we’ve placed it at the end according to the creator’s wishes. Viewing order: “Violet,” “Green,” “Yellow,” “Orange,” “Blue,” “Red,” “Pink,” “White”Īgain, Kaleidoscope’s episodes are said to be designed to be watched in any order except “White,” which is intended to be seen last even though “Red” and “Pink” take place, respectively, one day and six months after the heist. It depends on which episode they watched in the lead-up.) Still, the confusion generated along the way often seems kind of pointless, and anyone looking for Kaleidoscope to offer a revolution in how TV storytelling works will likely be disappointed. When one character says of the big score, “We’ve got a chance to fix everything that went wrong in our lives,” viewers know how wrong he is. It also sometimes yields memorable moments of dramatic irony. The random approach ultimately gels into a (mostly) satisfying story. Kaleidoscope is full of such moments, but none of them really reshape our understanding of the characters or force us to rethink what we’ve seen before.ĭoes that make it a failed experiment? Nah. There’s a little burst of pleasure that comes from, say, finally figuring out why that pink stuffed animal is so significant. But the experience is more disorienting than revealing.īy starting with “Red,” an episode set in the immediate aftermath of the central heist depicted in “White,” the intended finale, I mostly found myself wondering, Who are these people and what do they want? (Also, Why is Giancarlo Esposito in a camouflage wetsuit?) By the end, Kaleidoscope has connected all the narrative dots, but watching the episodes randomly, or at least in the random combination I chose, doesn’t cast the events in a different light so much as delay explaining what’s going on. Each episode opens with a narrator setting up what’s to come, which creates a sense that any episode could be the first. Specifically, I watched “Red” followed by “Yellow,” “Violet,” “Green,” “Blue,” “Orange,” “Pink,” and then “White.” And while I’d love to report that the series achieved its experimental goals, it honestly felt like watching a series out of order. This is how I, your Kaleidoscope guinea pig, watched the series. (We’re going to go light on spoilers, too, since surprise is pretty key to enjoying the show in any order.) But surely some ways of watching are better than others, right? Here are a few options and the pros and cons presented by each. In keeping with the spirit of the series, let’s assume there’s no ideal Kaleidoscope viewing order. Rule-breakers who throw the finale into the mix have a mind-boggling 40,320 ways to watch Kaleidoscope. Just how many different experiences are possible? If you follow the rules and save “White” for last, there are 5,040 possible combinations of the seven episodes leading up to it. How? Apart from “White,” designed as the eight-episode season’s finale, Kaleidoscope can be watched in any order - or as Netflix puts it, “the order in which they watch the episodes will affect their viewpoint on the story, the characters, and the questions and answers at the heart of the heist.” Each selection, in other words, will give viewers a different experience of watching the show. But the show’s title also refers to a device that mixes and matches colors to form new patterns, which Kaleidoscope encourages its viewers to do as well. Each episode bears the name of a different hue, which in turn figures heavily into the episode’s visual scheme. As the title suggests, colors play a major role in the heist drama, the creation of Matchstick Men author Eric Garcia. Kaleidoscope arrives on Netflix with not one gimmick but two. Rule-breakers who throw the finale into the mix have a mind-boggling 40,320 ways to watch. An iTunes-compatible CD or DVD recorder to create audio CDs, MP3 CDs, or backup CDs or DVDs.If you follow the rules and save “White” for last, there are 5,040 possible ways to watch Kaleidoscope.An Internet connection to use Apple Music, the iTunes Store and iTunes Extras.A screen resolution of 1024 by 768 or greater 1280 by 800 or greater is required to play an iTunes LP or iTunes Extras.Playing 1080p HD video requires a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or faster processor 2GB of RAM and an Intel GMA X4500HD, ATI Radeon HD 2400, NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS or better.Playing 720p HD video, an iTunes LP or iTunes Extras requires a 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo or faster processor 1GB of RAM and an Intel GMA X3000, ATI Radeon X1300, NVIDIA GeForce 6150 or better.Playing standard-definition video from the iTunes Store requires an Intel Pentium D or faster processor, 512MB of RAM and a DirectX 9.0–compatible video card.A PC with a 1GHz Intel or AMD processor with support for SSE2, and 512MB of RAM.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |